[Originally posted on Speculative Evolution. Names redacted to provide some degree of privacy. Art by SthenaDrakaina.]
With the plants detailed here (I’ve decided to call them ‘plant-etoids’
in what I hope will induce groans) I worked backwards. Such an exercise,
while not speculative evolution in the purest sense, is nonetheless a
useful tool, for it allows us to consider how things we would normally
consider impossible seem to be, at the very least, possible. Even if I
am correct in all my speculation, plant-etoids are still very, very
unlikely to exist.
The first problem space plants would face
is adapting to conditions. As [REDACTED] pointed out, such a plant would
quite possibly go into stasis, at which point while it would, indeed, be
a PLANT! IN! SPACE!, it would hardly be anything particularly
significant. No, to have space plants—and, therefore, plant-etoids—the
plants would have to be able to cope with near vacuum, cold, and
radiation. [REDACTED] suggested the use of a planet slowly losing its
atmosphere.
We have a planet like that in our solar system—Mars.
According to some scientists, Mars may at one point have had a magnetic
field. When it lost its magnetic field, the solar wind from the Sun
stripped away the Martian atmosphere. Such a process would be slow,
allowing gradual evolution, and would also result in an increasing
amount of radiation reaching the surface. Mars, of course, did not go
this route. If life ever existed on the Red Planet, it is either
underground, in the ice, or simply extinct.
Escaping from the
planet, I feel, would be best provided by volcanic activity or a meteor
strike. While volcanic activity might seem like something that would
result in huge amounts of heat, given the lack of air there would be no
real opportunity for convection, and a reduced opportunity for condution
via the air. Instead, the soil and rock on top of the volcano would be
conducting the heat.
Water collection initially appeared to be an
insurmountable problem. However, I believe I developed a plausible
solution. The bladderwort has orb-like structures that it uses to catch
prey. I propose that a plant on a planet with a gradually thinning
atmosphere would be forced to develop something along the lines of an
analogous structure. Ice would be surrounded by plant matter, after
which the plant would develop an air-tight coating and generate
metabolic heat to melt the ice. The limited space available would force
the water to remain in a liquid state. Roots could then be extended to
absorb the water. Dessication could, of course, be solved by a waxy
covering, but plants without them are apparently already capable of
surviving vacuum for a day or so.
Nutrition could also be assured
in such a way. If the plant could survive in very poor soil (on a
Mars-like planet, I would say this is quite possibly a given), then by
capturing the ‘dirty snowballs’ they could also absorb amino acids and
various other elements necessary for survival. These comets could be
caught by having the plant-etoid extend structures made of spongy plant
matter. When a small comet impacted it, it would then surround it in
air-tight plant matter and absorb water and nutrients. In otherwords, it
would use a similar method as aerogel. This spongy plant matter could
evolve by natural selection; if the plant-etoid’s ancestors grew around
bits of ice to absorb them, then a comet embedded itself in the plant
would probably be absorbed, too. Sunlight, in turn, could be absorbed by
the spongy plant matter.
Reproduction would be asexual and
happen via budding, I would expect, though I suppose that if the
plant-etoid’s existed in large concentrations sexual reproduction would
also be a possibility—as they would be if the sperm and eggs were
suitably protected from the elements. Certainly the plant-etoid’s would
have a slow metabolism, so I would expect zygotes to last a rather long
time.
The plant-etoid would not need inhale or exhale carbon
dioxide or oxygen. Instead, it would operate by consuming all the oxygen
produced for cellular respiration, and consuming all the carbon dioxide
it produced for photosynthesis. Since the plant-etoid would have to
have very, very slow metabolism, gradually it could accumulate more and
more carbon dioxide (or oxygen), allowing gradual growth and
reproduction.
The ideal shape, I think, for the plant-etoid would
be a sphere. Such a shape would allow large amounts of area to be
exposed to sunlight without risking decreased exposure if the
plant-etoid turns sideways after getting hit hard enough. The
aforementiond spongy tissue would cover the outside of the plant and be
photosynthetic. It would also be only the outer layer that was alive; as
the plant-etoid grew larger and larger, it would accumulate heartwood,
or something similar, in the center, like a tree. Even after a
plant-etoid died, it would still float on, potentially food for other
organisms. Over a long period of time, the plant-etoid’s could act like
clearers, as small micrometeorites would get stuck in their spongy
tissue, but not digested.